Terrorist, Gamblers, and Whores, Oh My!
I must say there are a number of things that I dislike about “W.” For one, he lets Carl Rowe call the shots way, way, way, to often. Rowe gets Bush to do things that are politically expedient, so that Bush will supposedly get re-elected. Its like Rowe is looking at his demographic map and calculating where to best spend the money to get votes. This is nothing new, the elected members of the House and the Senate have been doing this for years. The democrats have been especially good at this. Dividing minority groups up, and then saying, “look, we are spending money on you!” We’ve got so many little groups now, that most folks are a member of at least several. Where once the people of this country were called Americans, now they are sub-categorized, special-interest Americans.
This kind of reminds me of when the twelve step programs got out of control in the nineties. “Hi, my name is Bob, and I’m an Alcoholic, Drug Abusing, Caffeine and Nicotine addicted, Recovering Sex addict, Co-dependant, Overeating, Compulsive Gambler/Debtor, Adult Child of an Alcoholic, Al-anon. “HI BOB!” If politicians were listening, they would have said, “Hi Bob, do you need some funding?” The difference between Bush and sKerry, on the domestic front, is about three hundred billion dollars. Bush’s proposed budget will be around 1.3 trillion, whereas sKerry’s will be 1.6 trillion. That’s about $4,500.00 per every person (plus the 9.3 million illegal aliens), currently residing in the USA.
(Speaking of illegal aliens. If you really want the illegals to leave, just start taking their money when they try to send it home via Wells Fargo. Its simple, when they can’t produce a valid SSI card, just keep the money. We won’t have to find them and deport them, they will leave on their own. Plus we could almost pay for these proposed budgets with the money we would collect.)
So the difference between sKerry and Bush on the domestic front adds up to about $10.00 per person. That’s hardly a drop in the bucket. So if that was all this election was about, all I’d need do is flip a coin and choose between Alfred E. ”W”. Neumann and Johnny the Horse-faced botox boy. Unfortunately, the only sub-group sKerry doesn’t care much about is the “Islamic Arab extremist ‘I want to kill you,’ group.” sKerry puts them right up there with other public nuisances like whores, and gamblers.
''We have to get back to the place we were, where terrorists are not the focus of our lives, but they're a nuisance,'' the article states as the Massachusetts senator's reply.
''As a former law enforcement person, I know we're never going to end prostitution. We're never going to end illegal gambling. But we're going to reduce it, organized crime, to a level where it isn't on the rise. It isn't threatening people's lives every day, and fundamentally, it's something that you continue to fight, but it's not threatening the fabric of your life.''
I’ve got a news flash for the stertorous Senator sKerry, Islamic Terrorism is not going away. Hopefully the threat level may be reduced over time, but it will never be just a nuisance. Terrorism has been brewing for a long while (thousands of years), and the terrorist have finally hit on a way that can allow them, with little resources, to bring a country to its knees (see Spain).
“Terrorist, Gamblers, and Whores, Oh My!’ This pronouncement, along with his idea that we need to conduct a “sensitive war on terror,” plus a twenty year voting record in which he has voted to weaken every aspect of our national defense, but has never voted to strengthen it, tells me one thing. All this drum beating that sKerry has done recently on the campaign trail about being tough on terrorist is a bunch of malarkey. The truth is, if you are for peace at any cost, then sKerry is your man (I know you are out there, I’ve seen the signs in your yard, right next to your gas guzzling SUV). However, if you want the US to go and kick some serious terrorist butt, before terrorist can come here and ‘blow you up real good,’ then Bush is your man. If you are undecided, you need to ask your self one little question:
WWOD. You remember the WWJD acronym that was going around a few years ago? (“What Would Jesus Do?” or my personal favorite, WWJWD, “What Would John Wayne Do?”), Well here is a new acronym that that should be on every “undecided” person’s mind when they go to vote. WWOD (What would Ossama Do?) Would he vote for the guy that has carried the war to the terrorist, who says things like, “We will hunt you down and kill you no matter where you hide,” or would he vote for the man who will wage a “sensitive” war on terror, by making speeches with such tough sounding things in them as, "You will lose and we will win.” Oh yeah, I bet OBL is trembling in fear at that prospect.
~Erthona
Dog of War
Our town has been attacked by a rabid dog,
wearing a human guise.
Infected by a virus of hate, and greed,
Anything that is not it, it will destroy.
This is not a being with which one can reason.
This rabid dog does not kill
out of jealousy, or envy.
He does not want what we have,
he wants to destroy what we are.
There are those who would cower,
behind words of peace,
because they fear reprisal.
They urge us, "do nothing,"
Beware of peace spoken by fearful men,
They are already dead men.
Today a rabid dog threatens our town.
We must track him down,and kill him.
There is no middle ground. It is him or us,
and the outcome is not certain.
© Dale B. Tisdale 2001(Written September 19, 2001) (revised 2004)
http://www.geocities.com/erthona/dogofwar.html
This kind of reminds me of when the twelve step programs got out of control in the nineties. “Hi, my name is Bob, and I’m an Alcoholic, Drug Abusing, Caffeine and Nicotine addicted, Recovering Sex addict, Co-dependant, Overeating, Compulsive Gambler/Debtor, Adult Child of an Alcoholic, Al-anon. “HI BOB!” If politicians were listening, they would have said, “Hi Bob, do you need some funding?” The difference between Bush and sKerry, on the domestic front, is about three hundred billion dollars. Bush’s proposed budget will be around 1.3 trillion, whereas sKerry’s will be 1.6 trillion. That’s about $4,500.00 per every person (plus the 9.3 million illegal aliens), currently residing in the USA.
(Speaking of illegal aliens. If you really want the illegals to leave, just start taking their money when they try to send it home via Wells Fargo. Its simple, when they can’t produce a valid SSI card, just keep the money. We won’t have to find them and deport them, they will leave on their own. Plus we could almost pay for these proposed budgets with the money we would collect.)
So the difference between sKerry and Bush on the domestic front adds up to about $10.00 per person. That’s hardly a drop in the bucket. So if that was all this election was about, all I’d need do is flip a coin and choose between Alfred E. ”W”. Neumann and Johnny the Horse-faced botox boy. Unfortunately, the only sub-group sKerry doesn’t care much about is the “Islamic Arab extremist ‘I want to kill you,’ group.” sKerry puts them right up there with other public nuisances like whores, and gamblers.
''We have to get back to the place we were, where terrorists are not the focus of our lives, but they're a nuisance,'' the article states as the Massachusetts senator's reply.
''As a former law enforcement person, I know we're never going to end prostitution. We're never going to end illegal gambling. But we're going to reduce it, organized crime, to a level where it isn't on the rise. It isn't threatening people's lives every day, and fundamentally, it's something that you continue to fight, but it's not threatening the fabric of your life.''
I’ve got a news flash for the stertorous Senator sKerry, Islamic Terrorism is not going away. Hopefully the threat level may be reduced over time, but it will never be just a nuisance. Terrorism has been brewing for a long while (thousands of years), and the terrorist have finally hit on a way that can allow them, with little resources, to bring a country to its knees (see Spain).
“Terrorist, Gamblers, and Whores, Oh My!’ This pronouncement, along with his idea that we need to conduct a “sensitive war on terror,” plus a twenty year voting record in which he has voted to weaken every aspect of our national defense, but has never voted to strengthen it, tells me one thing. All this drum beating that sKerry has done recently on the campaign trail about being tough on terrorist is a bunch of malarkey. The truth is, if you are for peace at any cost, then sKerry is your man (I know you are out there, I’ve seen the signs in your yard, right next to your gas guzzling SUV). However, if you want the US to go and kick some serious terrorist butt, before terrorist can come here and ‘blow you up real good,’ then Bush is your man. If you are undecided, you need to ask your self one little question:
WWOD. You remember the WWJD acronym that was going around a few years ago? (“What Would Jesus Do?” or my personal favorite, WWJWD, “What Would John Wayne Do?”), Well here is a new acronym that that should be on every “undecided” person’s mind when they go to vote. WWOD (What would Ossama Do?) Would he vote for the guy that has carried the war to the terrorist, who says things like, “We will hunt you down and kill you no matter where you hide,” or would he vote for the man who will wage a “sensitive” war on terror, by making speeches with such tough sounding things in them as, "You will lose and we will win.” Oh yeah, I bet OBL is trembling in fear at that prospect.
~Erthona
Dog of War
Our town has been attacked by a rabid dog,
wearing a human guise.
Infected by a virus of hate, and greed,
Anything that is not it, it will destroy.
This is not a being with which one can reason.
This rabid dog does not kill
out of jealousy, or envy.
He does not want what we have,
he wants to destroy what we are.
There are those who would cower,
behind words of peace,
because they fear reprisal.
They urge us, "do nothing,"
Beware of peace spoken by fearful men,
They are already dead men.
Today a rabid dog threatens our town.
We must track him down,and kill him.
There is no middle ground. It is him or us,
and the outcome is not certain.
© Dale B. Tisdale 2001(Written September 19, 2001) (revised 2004)
http://www.geocities.com/erthona/dogofwar.html
posted by Tharmas Erthona at 2:03 PM
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home